Services Support
Online inquiry

For Research Use Only. Not For Clinical Use.

Contact us
  • Email:

Genome-integrating Reprogramming of Stem Cells

Overview Steps Troubleshooting Related Services FAQs

The development of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) allows differentiated somatic cells to be reprogrammed back into a pluripotent state. One of the earliest and still widely used strategies involves genome-integrating reprogramming methods, primarily based on retroviruses and lentiviruses. These viral vectors introduce key transcription factors—OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC (OSKM)—into somatic cells, where they stably integrate into the host genome and drive reprogramming.

At Creative Biolabs, we provide comprehensive genome-integrating reprogramming solutions tailored for researchers who require efficient and reproducible generation of iPSCs. This protocol outlines the complete workflow, optimization strategies, and related services we provide to accelerate your stem cell projects.

Overview of Genome-Integrating Reprogramming

Genome-integrating systems, such as retroviruses and lentiviruses, introduce reprogramming factor cDNAs into the host cell genome. Once integrated, these transgenes are stably expressed, ensuring persistent transcription factor activity to reset the epigenetic state of somatic cells and drive them into a pluripotent state. Because integration is permanent, the introduced factors continue to influence cell behavior until silenced epigenetically, providing strong and reliable induction pressure.

Categories of Genome-Integrating Systems

  • Retroviral Vectors: Preferentially infect dividing cells, highly efficient in fibroblasts, and widely used in early iPSC studies.
  • Lentiviral Vectors: Capable of infecting both dividing and non-dividing cells, expanding the range of target cell types and improving flexibility.
  • Hybrid Systems: Engineered vectors with inducible promoters or safety modifications to reduce risks of random integration or transgene reactivation.
Advantages Limitations
  • High efficiency: Strong, stable expression of OSKM factors ensures robust reprogramming.
  • Insertional mutagenesis: Random integration sites may disrupt host genes or regulatory regions.
  • Reproducibility: Widely tested and standardized across laboratories worldwide.
  • Transgene reactivation: Residual factor expression can interfere with differentiation fidelity.
  • Broad applicability: Effective in multiple somatic cell sources, including fibroblasts, PBMCs, keratinocytes, and neural progenitors.
  • Clinical unsuitability: Because of safety risks, genome-integrating methods are not recommended for clinical translation.
  • Cost-effective: Requires relatively simple laboratory infrastructure compared to non-integrating systems.
  • Variable silencing: Efficiency of transgene silencing differs between clones, requiring careful validation.

While we provide cutting-edge integration-free reprogramming services, we also maintain optimized protocols, custom vector systems, and expert support for genome-integrating methods, ensuring our clients can choose the right tool for the right research stage.

Protocol Steps

Preparation of Genome-Integrating Viral Particles

Seed cells at 70% confluence. Co-transfect cells with vector plasmids, packaging plasmids, and envelope plasmids. Replace media after 6–8 hours. Collect viral supernatant at 48 and 72 hours. Filter through filter; concentrate virus by ultracentrifugation if needed.

Transduction of Somatic Cells

Plate target somatic cells at ~50% confluence. Add viral supernatant with polybrene. Incubate overnight. Replace with fresh medium the next day. Perform 2–3 rounds of infection for optimal efficiency.

Early Culture Phase

Maintain cells in fibroblast medium during initial post-transduction days. Monitor cell survival; supplement with ROCK inhibitor if needed. Change media daily.

Transition to iPSC Medium

Switch to iPSC medium supplemented with bFGF. Replace media every day. Observe for morphological changes, such as increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio.

Colony Formation

Colonies with tight borders and ES-like morphology typically appear within 2–3 weeks. Select and manually pick colonies between days 18–25. Transfer colonies to coated plates for expansion.

Expansion and Maintenance of iPSC Lines

Expand colonies under feeder-free, xeno-free culture conditions. Use EDTA or enzyme-free passaging to preserve pluripotency. Avoid over-confluence to prevent spontaneous differentiation.

Validation of iPSCs

Confirm pluripotency markers (OCT4, NANOG, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60). Perform qPCR to verify endogenous OSKM expression. Test silencing of integrated viral transgenes. Conduct karyotyping and embryoid body differentiation assays.

Troubleshooting and Optimization Tips

We leverage decades of expertise to provide troubleshooting support and tailored optimization strategies. Below, we outline common problems and practical solutions.

Problem Possible Cause Solution
Low viral titer or inefficient packaging
  • Suboptimal transfection of packaging cells
  • Poor plasmid quality or degraded reagents
  • Incorrect timing of viral harvest
  • Use endotoxin-free, high-purity plasmids
  • Optimize transfection reagent
  • Harvest supernatant at both 48 and 72 hours
Poor transduction efficiency
  • Low MOI
  • Inefficient viral uptake due to cell type differences
  • Suboptimal polybrene concentration
  • Increase MOI while monitoring for cytotoxicity
  • Perform multiple rounds of infection
  • Use spinoculation to enhance uptake
  • Adjust polybrene levels
High cell death after transduction
  • Viral toxicity or excessive polybrene exposure
  • Fragile or over-passaged starting cells
  • Reduce polybrene exposure time
  • Supplement with ROCK inhibitor post-infection
  • Use early-passage, healthy somatic cells
Delayed or absent colony formation
  • Ineffective factor expression
  • Suboptimal culture conditions
  • Senescent or low-quality starting cells
  • Confirm OSKM expression by qPCR or immunostaining
  • Supplement cultures with small molecules (valproic acid, CHIR99021)
  • Culture under hypoxic conditions to improve efficiency
Abnormal colony morphology
  • Partial reprogramming
  • Early differentiation due to overgrowth
  • Select colonies with compact, ES-like morphology
  • Avoid passaging late; maintain <80% confluence
  • Discard irregular colonies to maintain culture integrity
Persistent transgene expression
  • Incomplete epigenetic silencing
  • High integration copy number
  • Extend passaging to allow silencing
  • Screen clones with PCR/qPCR for residual vector expression
  • For sensitive applications, consider switching to integration-free methods
Loss of pluripotency during expansion
  • Culture stress or poor medium quality
  • Genomic instability accumulating over time
  • Maintain feeder-free, xeno-free medium such as TeSR-E8
  • Regularly monitor pluripotency markers and karyotype stability
  • Create early-passage master cell banks

Related Services at Creative Biolabs

Genome-integrating reprogramming provides researchers with a powerful and efficient route to generating iPSCs. Our mission is to empower your stem cell research by providing end-to-end solutions that cover every stage—from viral vector design to downstream differentiation and organoid development.

We offer comprehensive reprogramming services, generating genome-integrated iPSCs from your starting materials. Each project is tailored to maximize efficiency and colony quality, with full documentation provided.

Every iPSC line requires careful validation. We provide a multi-tier QC package to confirm pluripotency and genomic stability.

Once genome-integrating iPSCs are established, they can serve as versatile platforms for lineage-specific studies. We offer directed differentiation services.

With us, you gain not only high-quality iPSCs but also the confidence that your project is supported by a team with over 20 years of CRO experience.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the difference between retroviral and lentiviral vectors in reprogramming?

A: Retroviruses can only infect dividing cells, making them highly effective for fibroblasts and similar sources. Lentiviruses, in contrast, infect both dividing and non-dividing cells, broadening their utility to PBMCs, keratinocytes, and other somatic types. Creative Biolabs offers both systems, guiding clients to the most suitable platform depending on the target cells and research goals.

Q: How long does it take to generate genome-integrating iPSCs?

A: Colony formation usually begins within 10–14 days post-transduction, with stable iPSC lines established and validated within 6–8 weeks. The exact timeline depends on cell type, viral titer, and culture conditions. Creative Biolabs provides streamlined workflows with integrated QC steps to reduce variability and accelerate delivery of validated iPSC lines.

Q: What can I do if I observe persistent transgene expression in my iPSCs?

A: Persistent transgene activity indicates incomplete silencing. Possible solutions include extended passaging, clone selection based on silencing markers, and screening multiple colonies. If reactivation persists, integration-free systems may be better suited. Creative Biolabs provides transgene clearance assays and expert consultation to help identify stable clones.

Q: Does Creative Biolabs offer both genome-integrating and integration-free reprogramming services?

A: Absolutely. We provide a full suite of reprogramming solutions, including retroviral, lentiviral, Sendai virus, episomal, and mRNA-based systems. This flexibility allows us to design the most appropriate workflow for each project, whether efficiency, safety, or translational readiness is the primary goal.

Created September 2025

For Research Use Only. Not For Clinical Use.