Services Support
Online inquiry

For Research Use Only. Not For Clinical Use.

Contact us
  • Email:

Lentivirus-mediated Reprogramming of Stem Cells

Overview Materials and Reagents Steps Troubleshooting Related Services FAQs

Lentivirus-mediated reprogramming remains a workhorse for iPSC generation—particularly where efficiency, scalability, and broad donor compatibility matter. With deliberate MOI planning, defined feeder-free systems, and a rigorous QC gateway, you can achieve high-quality, low-VCN iPSC lines ready for differentiation, disease modeling, screening, or engineering.

Creative Biolabs is here to co-design your strategy and to carry you from donor cells to clean, banked iPSC clones with confidence.

Overview of Lentiviral Reprogramming

Lentiviral reprogramming uses self-inactivating LV vectors to deliver canonical pluripotency factors, typically OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, c-MYC (OSKM), into somatic cells to induce an iPSC state.

The introduction of reprogramming factors into adult somatic cells. (OA Literature)Fig.1 Human iPSC technology.1,2

Why Choose Lentiviral Reprogramming?

  • High efficiency with difficult donors. Primary fibroblasts, PBMC-derived cells, and certain epithelial cells transduce well with LV.
  • Broad tropism & stable delivery. VSV-G–pseudotyped LV enables efficient entry and stable integration of reprogramming factors.
  • Tunable expression. Constitutive (e.g., EF1α, PGK) or inducible (Tet-On) promoters sustain factor expression during the reprogramming window.
  • Scalable & reproducible. Titrated viral stocks, defined MOI, and feeder-free conditions support predictable outcomes project-to-project.

If genomic integration is a hard no, consider our Sendai virus, episomal plasmid, or mRNA protocols.

Materials and Reagents

Category Reagents
Cells Human dermal fibroblasts, blood-derived CD34+ cells, or other somatic cells (mycoplasma-free, low passage)
Vectors Polycistronic OSKM (e.g., STEMCCA-like) or individual LV constructs for OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, c-MYC
Virus Ready-to-use, titrated lentivirus
Media & supplements Somatic cell growth medium
Reprogramming medium
Extracellular matrix
ROCK inhibitor
Polybrene or protamine sulfate to enhance transduction

Protocol Steps

Prepare Cells & Coating

Thaw and expand somatic cells to ~70–80% confluence; ensure mycoplasma-free status. Coat plates. Optional: pre-seed MEFs if using feeders.

Transduction

Plate cells to ensure they are 50–70% confluent at transduction. Replace medium with fresh growth medium containing polybrene. Add lentivirus to achieve target MOI. Mix gently. Optional spinoculation and incubate 12–16 h at 37°C.

Transition to Reprogramming Conditions

Replace with fresh growth medium (without polybrene). For difficult cell types, repeat a lower-MOI transduction to increase cassette integration while avoiding toxicity. Switch to iPSC medium. Add small-molecule enhancers if using for the first 7–10 days. If feeder-dependent, replating onto MEFs can occur here; otherwise continue feeder-free.

Colony Picking

Daily medium changes. Watch for epithelial-like patches, compact cell borders, high nucleus: cytoplasm ratio, and nucleoli prominence. Mark colonies with classic iPSC morphology. Treat with ROCK inhibitor to pick. Manually pick colonies (clump passaging) to new plates. Expand each clone in separate wells; record clone IDs, passage numbers, and any phenotypic notes.

Troubleshooting and Optimization Tips

Problem Possible Cause Solution
Low transduction efficiency
  • MOI too low
  • Poor cell health
  • No enhancer
  • Matrix not optimal
  • Increase MOI incrementally
  • Add polybrene/protamine
  • Verify cell viability (>90%)
  • Ensure fresh virus and proper storage (−80°C, minimal freeze-thaw).
High cell death post-transduction
  • Excess polybrene
  • Too high MOI
  • Spinoculation stress
  • Reduce enhancer concentration
  • Lower MOI
  • Shorten virus exposure
  • Include ROCK inhibitor 24–48 h
  • Allow recovery before re-dosing
Few/no iPSC colonies
  • Inadequate factor expression window
  • Suboptimal small-molecule regimen
  • Use Tet-On and extend induction 2–4 days
  • Add VPA/ascorbic acid
  • Optimize CHIR/PD dosing
  • Ensure daily medium changes
Differentiated edges in colonies
  • Over-confluence
  • Infrequent medium changes
  • Matrix aging
  • Passage earlier
  • Switch to fresh matrix
  • Increase medium volume/frequency
  • Cut off differentiating edges during passaging
Persistent exogenous factor expression
  • Dox not fully withdrawn
  • High VCN
  • Confirm Dox removal
  • Dilute clones to obtain those with lower VCN
  • Consider excision
Abnormal karyotype
  • Culture stress
  • Late-passage picking
  • Pick earlier
  • Minimize single-cell stress
  • Use ROCK inhibitor
  • Reduce passaging time; bank early passages

Related Services at Creative Biolabs

Because no two reprogramming projects are alike, we've built an integrated menu of add-on and alternative services that plug neatly into your lentiviral workflow—or replace it when an integration-free route is required.

Tell us your starting material, constraints, and downstream assays, and we'll assemble a fit-for-purpose plan and data package.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What starting cell types work best for LV reprogramming?

A: Human dermal fibroblasts, PBMC-derived erythroblasts, dental pulp cells, and urine-derived epithelial cells are reliable. Key is health: ≥90% viability, mycoplasma-free, and consistent growth. If your input is rare or fragile, we'll adjust seeding density, matrix, and enhancer windows.

Q: What passage range should fibroblasts be at?

A: P2–P6 is a sweet spot. Earlier passages reduce senescence-related variability and improve clonogenicity. Very late passages can reprogram, but expect lower efficiency and more QC attrition.

Q: We see few or no colonies—what now?

A: Check cell health, confirm titer/MOI, and verify enhancer concentrations. Try spinoculation if tolerated, switch to laminin-521, and ensure daily full medium changes. A short VPA/ascorbic window often rescues early epithelialization.

Q: What are the sample requirements?

A: ≥2 × 10⁶ viable cells (or agreed equivalent), ≥90% viability, mycoplasma-negative, and accompanied by non-identifying donor/source metadata and culture history. Tell us about any prior edits or antibiotics.

Q: Do you offer differentiation into assay-ready cell types?

A: We do. Neural progenitors, dopaminergic neurons, cardiomyocytes, hepatocyte-like cells, endothelial cells, and more.

Q: Can you genome-edit the iPSCs after reprogramming?

A: Yes. RNP or mRNA CRISPR with clonal isolation, on-target confirmation, prioritized off-target shortlist, and post-edit karyotype. We strongly recommend producing isogenic control lines in parallel.

References

  1. Belviso, Immacolata, et al. "Non-integrating methods to produce induced pluripotent stem cells for regenerative medicine: An overview." Biomechanics and functional tissue engineering (2020). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95070
  2. Distributed under Open Access license CC BY 3.0, without modification.

Created September 2025

For Research Use Only. Not For Clinical Use.