Genome titer
qPCR or ddPCR measures vector genome concentration. It counts genomes but not whether particles are intact and infectious.
Creative Biolabs designs, produces, and functionally validates custom lentiviral vectors for basic research, from a raw sequence or existing plasmid to sequence-verified, titered particles. Tell us your transgene, target cell type, and intended readout, and we define the vector design, pseudotype, production scale, and QC plan that match your experiment.
A lentiviral vector integrates its transgene into the host genome, providing stable expression in both dividing and non-dividing cells and supporting cargo up to roughly 8–10 kb. Creative Biolabs covers design, cloning and sequence verification, production and concentration, pseudotyping, and functional QC so you can move from a sequence to publication-grade data. Define the promoter, envelope, and payload, and confirm the titer and integration profile for your target cell before committing a full screen.
The vector only helps when its design matches the delivery and expression problem. These scenarios describe when a custom lentiviral approach is the right fit.
Each module is scoped to your target and readout. Modules can be combined or selected independently.
The envelope determines tropism; the scale determines volume and titer. These choices are made together with your target cell and readout.
Each endpoint answers a different question about your vector. Match the measurement to the decision you are making.
qPCR or ddPCR measures vector genome concentration. It counts genomes but not whether particles are intact and infectious.
Flow cytometry measures percent-positive cells at defined MOIs, reflecting real transduction capacity.
Droplet digital PCR against WPRE and a reference gene quantifies integration copies per diploid genome.
A qPCR assay screens for replication-competent lentivirus with high analytical sensitivity.
Endotoxin removal and lot-release LAL data support in vivo use and vivarium acceptance.
A 10-point MOI matrix identifies the working MOI that hits target positivity with minimal viability loss.
This sequence connects design with interpretable evidence. Acceptance criteria are agreed for each stage.
Confirm promoter, payload, envelope, and safety elements against the target cell.
Assemble the cassette and verify the full insert by Sanger sequencing.
Transfect, harvest, concentrate, and deplete endotoxin to the agreed scale.
Run genome and functional titer, integration, and RCL or purity endpoints.
Deliver frozen aliquots, certificates, and raw QC data for your experiment.
A high genome titer does not guarantee functional transduction in your target cell. Confirm functional titer and expression in the intended model.
Delivering the vector is not the same as answering the biological question. These boundaries should be explicit before committing resources.
Integration-competent lentiviral vectors insert semi-randomly. Copy number, clonal composition, and insertional effects should be considered for the intended model.
Lentiviral vectors tolerate roughly 8–10 kb, but titer can decline with larger inserts. Check capacity before committing a large cassette.
Stable integration is not always desirable. For transient or dose-controlled studies, consider an inducible or integration-deficient design.
A pseudotype that works in one cell line may not transduce your primary or organoid model. Confirm tropism empirically.
Batch-to-batch variability and vector-associated effects require matched control vectors and independent preparations.
From Question to Evidence
Select a service around the missing material or evidence in your study. Share the transgene, target cell, envelope preference, and intended readout so the technical discussion can define feasibility, inputs, and deliverables.
Configure the promoter, cassette architecture, safety elements, and markers for your target cell. Start with the transgene, cell type, and intended readout; feasibility review determines the design and validation plan.
Scope and outputs: Annotated plasmid files, design rationale, and sequence verification.
Scale a validated construct with defined titer, purity, endotoxin, and QC. Distinguish pilot, midi, and pre-clinical volumes and confirm functional titer before downstream use.
Scope and outputs: Concentrated stock, lot certificates, and raw QC data.
Deliver shRNA or miRNA cassettes for stable, long-term knockdown. Specify the target, transcript, and control hairpins; confirmation of knockdown is a separate readout from vector delivery.
Scope and outputs: shRNA vector design, production, and QC.
Configure lentiviral delivery of Cas9, sgRNA, or donor constructs. Separate delivery of editing components from the edited-cell phenotype in the study design.
Scope and outputs: Editing-vector design, production, and verification.
Select or engineer the envelope glycoprotein to redirect tropism. Confirm transduction in the exact target population rather than a proxy line.
Scope and outputs: Pseudotype design, production, and transduction comparison.
Selected Reading
Naldini L, Blömer U, Gallay P, et al. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science . 1996;272(5259):263-267. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5259.263 .
Zufferey R, Dull T, Mandel RJ, et al. Self-inactivating lentivirus vector for safe and efficient in vivo gene delivery. J Virol . 1998;72(12):9873-9880. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.72.12.9873-9880.1998 .
Page A, Fusil F, Cosset FL. Toward tightly tuned gene expression following lentiviral vector transduction. Viruses . 2020;12(12):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121427 .
Answers about study inputs, custom scope, reporting, and the next step after an inconclusive result.
Provide the transgene or construct, target cell type, intended readout, and envelope preference. Include the promoter, payload size, and any existing plasmid or sequence. If a pseudotype has not been selected, share the cell type so feasibility can be reviewed before design.
Yes. A project can focus on a single module, such as design, cloning, or production. Specify the material, verification requirements, and control relationships. The scope should distinguish construct generation from functional validation, with deliverables and acceptance criteria agreed separately.
VSV-G offers broad tropism, while Rabies-G, BaEV-R, and RD114 target neurons, HSPCs or primary T cells, and T/NK cells respectively. The choice should be confirmed empirically in your exact cell type. Share the target population and a side-by-side transduction comparison can guide the MOI.
Genome titer (TU/mL by qPCR or ddPCR) counts vector genomes, while functional titer (by flow cytometry) measures actual transduction. A high genome titer does not guarantee functional transduction, so both are reported and cross-checked.
Requirements depend on construct readiness, payload size, pseudotype, scale, and QC scope. Share available amounts and target milestones. The proposal states accepted materials, required work stages, deliverable formats, and factors that could change the schedule.
The result should be reported against the prespecified endpoints. Review the pseudotype, promoter, payload size, MOI, and cell condition before interpreting the mismatch. A different envelope, promoter, or expression design may be needed. Low transduction in one model does not invalidate the vector for another.
Tell us about your project, and our experts will get back to you with a customized quote and proposal.